Dear Dr. Dave,
My husband was in a car accident that occurred at 5 p.m. He hadn’t smoked since the night before, at around 9pm. The police charged him with driving under the influence of marijuana, although he hadn’t smoked since 20 hours prior. Will he still test positive with active THC on the blood they took?
-Alinda in Arizona
The mere presence of THC or its metabolites is not indicative of impairment. It indicates relatively recent use. According to the National High Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), cannabis does not increase accident risk. Some studies show that cannabis actually lowers accident risk.
The NHTSA says if one is “impaired” from cannabis they drive slower and more carefully. The FDA gives the standard psychoactive drug warning for Marinol, or synthetic THC, which has been FDA approved and on the market since 1986, “Warning: Don’t drive, operate heavy equipment or engage in dangerous activity until you determine if it interferes with those activities. Some consumers of cannabis don’t have trouble driving, and in some cases, their driving improves.
Feel free to have your husband’s lawyer give me a call to discuss the science and the possibility of expert witnessing.
Yes , that’s what we argued in court but I got 15 years anyway ,
Hi Dr Dave
My son was pulled over in AZ for a traffic violation and charged with a DUI. He claims that he never did what the cops are saying he did. His bloodwork showed 2.9 of THC in his system. We have hired an attorney who agrees the videos they have of him don’t show any signs of impairment. How do we prove that he wasn’t impaired. He was charged in Oct 2019 and the case keeps getting postponed. He is a really good student and would hate this incident to affect his future.